Evidence Manifest — Structural Invariants of the Semantic Core
Associated Research Paper
Structural Invariants of the Semantic Core: A Cross-Implementation Study of Web-Based Semantic Reference Structures
Research area: Semantic Infrastructure
Evidence state: September 2026
Purpose
This evidence manifest identifies the Semantic Core implementation states preserved as the evidentiary basis for the cross-implementation study Structural Invariants of the Semantic Core.
The preserved resources correspond to the documented implementation states examined in the study and provide a stable historical basis for subsequent inspection, comparison, and challenge.
Evidence Boundary
The archived resources are preserved solely as historical research evidence. They do not constitute alternative, substitute, or canonical Semantic Core implementations.
Canonical authority remains with the original implementation URLs identified below.
The evidence package preserves the Semantic Core states examined in the study. Later Human Context Layer implementations, subsequent architectural developments, and other adjacent resources are not incorporated into the archived Semantic Core cases unless they formed part of the documented Core state under examination.
Subsequent changes to a live implementation do not alter the historical evidence state preserved by this package.
Primary Cases
The following five Semantic Core v3.0 implementations constitute the primary comparative set from which the candidate invariants were derived.
Validation State
Role: Primary Case
Implementation state: Semantic Core v3.0
Canonical reference: https://www.validationstate.com/
Evidence directory: validation-state/
Resources preserved: 10 Audit Evidence Resources and 2 Associated Deployment Resources.
Context Locking
Role: Primary Case
Implementation state: Semantic Core v3.0
Canonical reference: https://www.contextlocking.com/
Evidence directory: context-locking/
Resources preserved: 10 Audit Evidence Resources and 2 Associated Deployment Resources.
Cascade Halt
Role: Primary Case
Implementation state: Semantic Core v3.0
Canonical reference: https://www.cascadehalt.com/
Evidence directory: cascade-halt/
Resources preserved: 10 Audit Evidence Resources and 2 Associated Deployment Resources.
Main Entity
Role: Primary Case
Implementation state: Semantic Core v3.0
Canonical reference: https://www.mainentity.de/
Evidence directory: main-entity/
Resources preserved: 10 Audit Evidence Resources and 2 Associated Deployment Resources.
Behavioral Alignment
Role: Primary Case
Implementation state: Semantic Core v3.0
Canonical reference: https://www.behavioralalignment.de/
Evidence directory: behavioral-alignment/
Resources preserved: 10 Audit Evidence Resources and 2 Associated Deployment Resources.
Cross-Category Control
The following implementation was examined after the candidate invariant set had been derived from the five primary cases. Its role in the study is therefore distinct from the primary comparative set.
AI Liability
Role: Cross-Category Control
Implementation state: Semantic Core v3.0
Canonical reference: https://www.ailiability.de/
Evidence directory: ai-liability/
Resources preserved: 10 Audit Evidence Resources and 2 Associated Deployment Resources.
Resource Classification
Audit Evidence Resources
The following resource classes preserve the implementation material directly relevant to the documented cross-implementation audit:
- root representation (
index.html) - about
- method
- sources
- changelog
- license
- legal
- privacy
- terms
llms.txt
Associated Deployment Resources
The following resources are preserved as part of the documented deployment state but are not treated as independent evidence for the candidate invariants:
robots.txtsitemap.xml
Integrity
The preserved evidence resources are identified through SHA-256 checksums. The checksums provide file-level integrity verification for the frozen evidence state.
Checksum data will be documented separately within this evidence package.
Interpretation
This manifest identifies the evidence examined in the associated research paper. It does not extend the findings of that paper, introduce additional Semantic Core properties, or establish claims beyond the evidentiary boundaries documented in the study.
The preserved material enables later readers to inspect the implementation states on which the analysis was based and to reproduce, challenge, or reinterpret the documented cross-implementation comparison.